Wladimir Pazmiño
Portfolio›Case studies›Pronaca›Brand equity & measurement

Brand equity: measuring how strong a brand is, the same way every year.

Every year the same questions go to the same kind of consumer, and every year the company knows, with one number, whether the brand got stronger. That is brand equity measurement as I ran it at Pronaca: a standard model, three annual waves, and decisions taken on the result — including renewing a sponsorship and responding to a crisis.

Company
Pronaca — master brand and 30-brand portfolio
Framework
Salient · Meaningful · Different → Brand Power
Brand Power, three waves
16.3 → 16.3 → 22.0
Attribution
Equity tracked with the research partner
Brand equityTrackingSponsorship ROICrisis measurement
Pronaca

Pronaca brand mark, shown in the portfolio's two-tone palette. Source: company brand assets. Trademark belongs to its owner.

We called it

The Same Number Every Year.

A brand tracker is only useful if the company agrees in advance what the numbers are allowed to mean — and then refuses to redefine them mid-meeting. Standard model, same waves, same questions.

Key figures

Three annual waves of the master brand.

18 → 24%

spontaneous recall

In three years, in a category two national players were entering. Prompted recall rose too: the shelf got more crowded and the brand still came first.

22.0

Brand Power, from 16.3

Two flat years, then the step. That is what an endorsement brand and a corporate concept look like when they land.

15%

of shoppers brand-loyal — down from 25%

Loyalty eroding into price sensitivity, 34% price-driven. The value-added lines were built against exactly this.

How it is measured

Three questions, one score.

The tracker followed the industry-standard equity model, run with the research partner. The value of a standard model is not that it is clever. It is that nobody in the room can move the goalposts.

Salient

Does it come to mind?

Spontaneous and prompted recall. The cheapest dimension to buy with media — and the fastest to decay.

Meaningful

Does it meet the need, with affinity?

Contributes most to equity. The one a content estate can move without a single advertisement.

Different

Is it unique? Does it set the trend?

Hardest to earn in a commodity category — which is exactly why the endorsement brand existed.

What the measurement was used for

Two decisions taken on evidence.

Sponsorship

Renew on evidence

A national cooking-show sponsorship: 57% programme viewership, 74% sponsor recall — up from 52% three editions earlier — and 68–82% top-two-box across seven statements. That is a renewal argument, not a hunch.

Crisis

Measure the damage, then write the brief

A regulatory scare in one category: eight in ten had heard, 12% stopped buying, 60% would keep buying — and under half thought the company's response was adequate, mostly because they had not seen it. The last number was the brief.

Why it matters

A measurement is only useful if it can deliver bad news.

Equity measurement earns its budget on the day it says something the plan did not want to hear — that loyalty is eroding, that the response was not seen — and the company acts on it anyway. A tracker that only ever confirms the plan is a tracker somebody has been editing.

In your company

What this looks like when you bring it in.

What you get

One definition of brand health everyone signs

Salient, meaningful, different — measured the same way, every wave.

What builds up

Decisions you can defend

Renew a sponsorship on a number; size a crisis before you answer it.

What you stop paying for

The same argument in every meeting

The tracker settles it — including when the news is bad.

Keep going